National Temperature Index
National Temperature Index Plots
NCDC now uses a new dataset, nClimDiv, to determine the contiguous United States (CONUS) temperature. This new dataset is derived from a gridded instance of the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN-Daily), known as nClimGrid.
Previously, NCDC used a 2.5° longitude by 3.5° latitude gridded analysis of monthly temperatures from the 1,218 stations in the US Historical Climatology Network (USHCN v2.5) for its CONUS temperature. The new dataset interpolates to a much finer-mesh grid (about 5km by 5km) and incorporates values from several thousand more stations available in GHCN-Daily. In addition, monthly temperatures from stations in adjacent parts of Canada and Mexico aid in the interpolation of U.S. anomalies near the borders.
The switch to nClimDiv has little effect on the average national temperature trend or on relative rankings for individual years, because the new dataset uses the same set of algorithms and corrections applied in the production of the USHCN v2.5 dataset. However, although both the USHCN v2.5 and nClimDiv yield comparable trends, the finer resolution dataset more explicitly accounts for variations in topography (e.g., mountainous areas). Therefore, the baseline temperature, to which the national temperature anomaly is applied, is cooler for nClimDiv than for USHCN v2.5. This new baseline affects anomalies for all years equally, and thus does not alter our understanding of trends.
Figure 1: Comparison of national nClimDiv normals and national USCRN estimated normals for each month of the year for maximum, mean and minimum temperatures.
So as not to compare apples and oranges, the departures of nClimDiv and the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) values from normal values for each network are compared rather than the absolute values. The 30 years from 1981 through 2010 provide the basis for the normal period for each month and network. Data exist for nClimDiv from 1895 to present, so a normal is simply the 30-year average of the gridded data. USCRN observations since commissioning to the present (4-9 years) were used to find relationships to nearby COOP stations and estimate normals at the USCRN sites using the normals at the surrounding COOP sites derived from full 1981-2010 records (Sun and Peterson, 2005). The normal values for each month are then subtracted from each monthly temperature average to create anomalies or departures from normal that can be compared between networks over time. In the final step, the station data are interpolated to 0.25° latitude by 0.25° longitude grids over the lower 48 states and then combined in an area weighted average for the whole U.S. The final results of this process are the monthly National Temperature Index (NTI) values for nClimDiv and USCRN. Figure 1 displays the differences between nClimDiv normals and USCRN estimated normals for national maximum, mean and minimum temperature. Since the normal values in each of the networks do not maintain the same relationship from month-to-month, comparing absolute values would be confusing.
Figure 2: Comparison of annual national anomalies for the nClimDiv (solid) and USCRN (dashed) maximum (red), mean (green) and minimum (blue) temperatures.
In addition to comparing NTI's for nClimDiv and USCRN for 1 month, users may compare anomalies between nClimDiv and USCRN for the last 3, 6, 12 months, year-to-date (YTD), and annual periods. These are available on the time series graphing page. Close agreement between these two datasets demonstrates that nClimDiv and USCRN are both capable of accurately measuring the surface air temperature of the U.S. currently, in the past, and into the future. By verifying the USCRN result, the nClimDiv shows that a network with a relatively small number of carefully located and extremely accurate stations can represent the U.S. temperature record into the future. Having both is the best of all worlds, two records moving in lockstep into the future and providing independent verification of the temperature changes in the U.S. during the coming century. Close agreement between these two datasets demonstrates that nClimDiv and USCRN are both capable of accurately measuring the surface air temperature of the U.S. currently, in the past, and into the future (Figure 2).
A more detailed description of the nClimGrid dataset, which is used to compute nClimDiv, is available as Vose et al., 2014. Interested users are encouraged to read Vose et al., 2014 and its citations for further information.
- Sun, B. and T. C. Peterson, 2005: Estimating temperature normals for USCRN stations. Int. J. Climatol., 25: 1809-1817. doi: 10.1002/joc.1220.
- Vose, R.S., Applequist, S., Durre, I., Menne, M.J., Williams, C.N., Fenimore, C., Gleason, K., Arndt, D. 2014: Improved Historical Temperature and Precipitation Time Series For U.S. Climate Divisions Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0248.1