National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service Home Page. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Home Page. National Climatic Data Center Home Page. Department of Commerce Home Page. NOAA, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information ServiceNational Climatic Data Center, U.S. Department of Commerce

Due to some unexpected system maintenance, some of our online systems are unavailable. We apologize for the inconvenience.


State of the Climate
Drought
March 2006

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

National Climatic Data Center


Use the form below to access monthly reports.

« February 2006
Drought Report
April 2006 »
Drought Report


U.S. Drought Highlights:

Map showing Palmer Z Index
Palmer Z Index

Please Note: The data presented in this drought report are preliminary. Ranks, anomalies, and percent areas may change as more complete data are received and processed.


National Overview

On the national scale,


Regional Overview

Dryness affected many of the same areas this month that have experienced dry conditions during the last several months (February, January, December, November). March was much drier than normal along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts. About 14 percent of the contiguous U.S. was very dry (i.e., precipitation in the bottom 10th percentile of the historical record).

Above-normal precipitation continued to bring improvement to parts of the Rockies and central and southern Plains. During the month, beneficial rains brought relief to the drought area in northeast Texas, southeast Oklahoma and western Arkansas, and rain and snow brought relief to Nebraska and eastern Wyoming, but it was not enough to compensate for the significant deficits of the last 12 months.

Map showing 3-month Standardized Precipitation Index
3-month Standardized Precipitation Index

The March precipitation pattern at the primary stations in Alaska was dry in the interior and along the southeast panhandle. Across Hawaii, the precipitation pattern was wet most everywhere. In Puerto Rico, the month was predominantly wet, based on National Weather Service radar estimates of precipitation. March streamflow averaged near normal for Puerto Rico and the Hawaiian Islands.

Map showing Current Month Palmer Hydrological Drought Index
Palmer Hydrological Drought Index

Dryness intensified and spread along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts. For the last three months drought had been concentrated in the middle Atlantic states and in southern Louisiana, but the areas of dryness were spreading. Long-term moisture deficits persisted across most of the Mississippi Valley, central and eastern Texas, and the Southwest. Another area of long-term deficits was in the central Appalachians.

Some regional highlights:


Paleoclimatic Perspectives

March 2006, Pre-Instrumental Perspective, Southeast Arizona

April-March Arizona Division 7 precipitation
April-March Arizona Division 7 precipitation

Arizona has been experiencing very dry conditions for much of the last seven years. The southeast corner of the state (climate division 7) has been especially hard hit. Arizona Division 7 had the second driest winter (November-March) and fifth driest year (April-March) in the 1895-2006 historical record.

ANovember-March Arizona Division 7 precipitation, 1895-2006
November-March Arizona Division
7 precipitation, 1895-2006

Even after much-needed rains in March, most of Arizona and adjoining New Mexico was still experiencing one of worst winter droughts on record. This return to dry conditions for the region comes after a very wet winter in 2004-2005 which provided some recovery from the severe multi-year drought of 1999-2004. The southern parts of both states received less relief from the March storms than areas to the north, and most of Arizona division 7 was still classified as "extreme drought" on the late March to early April U.S. Drought Monitor.

The graph below (annual values in light blue, 5-year weighted average in dark blue) shows the winter (November- March) precipitation, 1896-2006, for Arizona Division 7. The value for 2006 (1.15 inches) is the lowest since 1904, although several other years were similarly low. The 1999-2004 drought (indicated with the yellow bar) had six winters in a row with precipitation below the long-term mean, which had not occurred since 1898-1904 (orange bar).

Paleoclimatic tree-ring reconstruction for Arizona Division 7 for 1650-2006
Paleoclimatic tree-ring reconstruction for
Arizona Division 7 for 1650-2006
- 200 KB Image

The graph to the left also shows a 343-year tree-ring record (1650-1992; annual values in light red; 5-year smoothed values in dark red) that corresponds well to the variability in November-March precipitation. This record is the average of two Douglas-fir tree-ring chronologies from southeast Arizona. These ring-width chronologies are unusual in that they are based on only part of the annual growth ring, the "earlywood", which closely reflects the influence of winter precipitation. The chronologies were developed by Meko and Baisan (2001), who used the other part of the annual ring ("latewood") of these same trees to reconstruct variability in summer precipitation. The correlation between the annual values of the tree-ring record and November-March precipitation is 0.698, indicating a high degree of shared variance.

The tree-ring record, as a proxy for precipitation, can put the winter precipitation variability of the last century in southeast Arizona into a much longer perspective. The record shows a handful years in the approximately 250-year period prior to 1895 that may have had very low winter precipitation similar to that of 2006; these extreme winter droughts appear to have been less frequent than in the last 100 years. The most severe and persistent multi-year periods of winter drought in the instrumental record (1898-1904 and 1999-2004) appear to have been matched or exceeded only once, in 1666-1673 (red bar). A 992-year reconstruction of November-April precipitation for Arizona Division 7, using an independent set of tree-ring data (Ni et al. 2002), confirms this assessment, and further suggests that the 1660s was the most severe and persistent period of winter drought since 1000 AD. The current winter drought, and the recent multi-year drought — which could be resuming after a one-year hiatus — are likely among the most severe events of their kind in the past 350 years.

Resources:

References:


Questions?

For questions on technical or scientific content of this report, please contact:

Richard Heim:
Richard.Heim@noaa.gov

For general climate monitoring questions, please contact:

CMB.Contact@noaa.gov

For climate data orders, please contact the National Climatic Data Center's Climate Services and Monitoring Division:

NCDC.Orders@noaa.gov

[ top ]