NOAA WP3D AIRCRAFT - SLOW-RATE 1 HZ DATA (MATLAB) C.
Friehe (University of California at Irvine, USA)
S. Burns (University of California at Irvine, USA)
D. Khelif (University of California at Irvine, USA)
There have been several changes and updates to the UCI-processed
WP-3D data since its initial availability announced on
February 9th, 1995. If you are using the UCI WP-3D data
which are dated previous to March 8, 1997 it is highly
recommended that you re-obtain these data.
Reprocessing on: 22 January 1996
-
Recalculated aircraft vertical velocity without using the
baro-loop (s_vzi1c "& " s_vzi2c).
-
Recalculated the vertical wind (using the recalculated
vertical velocity) .
-
Switched the dome and case temperatures for the Pyrgeometers -
recalculated these temperatures.
-
Dome and case temperatures for the Pyrgeometers used to
calculate the incoming "& " outgoing longwave radiation.
Reprocessing on: 12 March 1996
-
Introduced the revised
empirical offsets for ambient temperature, and dewpoint
temperature.
-
Recalculated all thermodynamic variables and winds using
these new offsets.
Reprocessing on: 8 March 1997
-
Include prt5 voltage data and calibration coefficients.
-
Include static pressure defect data.
-
Recalibrated the Lyman-alpha to account for a 2 second time
lag in the chilled-mirror dewpoint data.
-
Recalibrated angle of attack -- to find a new vertical wind
velocity (on N43RF).
-
Recalculated all thermodynamic variables and winds using new
offsets (slightly different than the values used in the
March 12, 1996 version).
Reprocessing on: 8 July 1997
-
Recalibrated angle of attack -- recalculated vertical wind
velocity.
Data Access Processed, slow-rate 1 Hz NOAA WP3D
aircraft N42RF and N43RF data with PostScript graphs are
available from the University of California at Irvine. Data
can be accessed via the WWW
to http://wave.eng.uci.edu/Projects/Toga_Cepex/togacoare.html.
From June 1996 on, data will also be available upon request
from NOAA's National Climatic Data Center (NCDC)in
Asheville, NC (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov) and from the
National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR)
in Boulder, CO (http://www.ucar.edu/ucar/).
Background During the four-month field phase of
TOGA COARE, the WP3Ds operated out of Honiara in the Solomon
Islands, conducting 22 and 23 individual sorties on the two
aircraft for a total flight hour usage of 374 hours.
Missions were conducted over a wide spectrum of weather from
near "clear sky" to highly disturbed. Nearly 80% of the
flight sorties were within the Intensive Flux Array (IFA);
however, most of the convectively active missions were
outside the IFA, except for the three-day period from 12 to
15 December 1992.
Most of the missions were a mix of boundary layer and
convective flight patterns depending upon the weather. Prior
to mid-February, the majority of the convective patterns
were at night, which precluded the collection of a large
amount of boundary layer data. After mid-February, the
convective missions were conducted during daylight hours so
boundary layer and Doppler data were collected
simultaneously.
The NOAA WP3D aircraft flight-level in-situ data, which are
gathered by standard aircraft instrumentation, consist of
measurements collected along the flight track of parameters
such as air temperature, dewpoint temperature, position,
altitude, etc., at a 1-sec data rate. The basic sensors and
measured parameters include:
Parameter Instrument
Latitude, longitude Two INS and one GPS system
Altitude above sea surface APN 232 and APN 159 radar
altimeters
Aircraft attitude static, dynamic, sideslip
and
attack pressure sensors
Hor and vert accelerations Two Inertial Navigation
Units
Air temperature Two Rosemount probes
Dew point temperature Cooled mirror
Radiometer air temperature CO2 radiometer
Sea surface temperature Barnes PRT-5
Up/down radiation Epply pyrohel
Electric field DRI field mills (up/down/
side)
Cloud water content Johnson-William's hot wire
Carl Friehe's group at the University of California at
Irvine processed the WP3D slow data in support of TOGA COARE
flux studies. The results of the UCI processing were
obtained independently of both the NOAA/AOC standard data
and the NOAA/NSSL GPS correction and recalculated AOC
horizontal winds. Some of the differences in processing are
described below.
Data File Information There are three directories:
DATA_MATLAB/ - contains all processed data files in MATLAB
binary format
Documents/ - contains documentation about the data
Plots_var/ - contains PostScript time series plots of
selected variables
described in paragraph above
(1) The following data files reside in subdirectory /DATA_MATLAB:
DATE CLASS WP3D42 (H) SIZE (MB) WP3D43 (I)
SIZE (MB)
921102 1 921102Hs_P.mat 36.1 921102Is_P.mat
35.1
921106 3 921106Hs_P.mat 36.2 921106Is_P.mat
35.3
921113 0 921113Hs_P.mat 37.0 921113Is_P.mat
33.8
921115 0 none - 921115Is_P.mat
36.3
921119 2 921119Hs_P.mat 32.0 921119Is_P.mat
26.6
921126 1 921126Hs_P.mat 34.6 921126Is_P.mat
36.4
921128 0 921128Hs_P.mat 32.5 921128Is_P.mat
30.3
921212 3 921212Hs_P.mat 37.1 921212Is_P.mat
35.6
921213 4 none - 921213Is_P.mat
35.6
921214 4 921214Hs_P.mat 35.4 921214Is_P.mat
18.7
921215 4 921215Hs_P.mat 31.2 921215Is_P.mat
30.2
921216 1 921216Hs_P.mat 40.2 921216Is_P.mat
36.1
930109 1 930109Hs_P.mat 37.7 930109Is_P.mat
38.8
930111 1 930111Hs_P.mat 27.7 none -
930116 1 930116Hs_P.mat 31.5 930116Is_P.mat
14.9
930117 1 930117Hs_P.mat 37.5 930117Is_P.mat
38.2
930118 1 930118Hs_P.mat 38.0 930118Is_P.mat
38.4
930201 0 930201Hs_P.mat 37.0 tape drive
failed -
930206 2 930206Hs_P.mat 38.7 930206Is_P.mat
35.3
930209 3 930209Hs_P.mat 38.0 930209Is_P.mat
28.4
930210 3 930210Hs_P.mat 30.6 930210Is_P.mat
29.5
930217 2 930217Hs_P.mat 37.7 none -
930219 1 none - 930219Is_P.mat
37.0
930220 3 930220Hs_P.mat 37.2 930220Is_P.mat
34.2
930222 4 930222Hs_P.mat 30.3 930222Is_P.mat
31.4
Data format: MATLAB binary format
Data volume: Files range from 15 to 40 Mbytes in size and
each file represents one flight.
File names: yymmdd(H or I)_P.mat (e.g., "930209Is_P.mat"),
where yy, mm, and dd are the year, month and day on which
the flight started. "H" refers to N42RF and "I" to N43RF, "_P
" stands for "processed" and ".mat" is the extension
required by MATLAB.
For the slow-rate 1-Hz data, there are some 160 variables. A
listing of these with definitions and units is available in
the PostScript file Projects/Toga_Cepex/Documents/0togac_slow_var.ps
and also in the ASCII Latex text file Projects/Toga_Cepex/Documents/0togac_slow_var.tex.
The variables are separated into four different types as
indicated by the "a_", "c_", "s_" or "z_" prefix on the
variable names:
- ASCII (string) ----> "a_"
- calibration coefficients ----> "c_"
- slow variables (actual time series) ----> "s_"
- miscellaneous (housekeeping) ----> "z_"
List of Variables
a_aaf s_mr_gef s_tpygud
a_dpref s_mruv s_tpygudV
a_fldate s_mruvcnts s_trdprt5
a_ssaf s_pdaf s_trdprt5_orig
a_timeEND s_pdar s_trki1c
a_timeSTART s_pdsf s_trki2c
a_ttref s_pdsr s_tsrdco2
c_baaf s_pitchi1 s_tsrdwin
c_bssaf s_pitchi2 s_ttf1
c_kaaf s_pqaf s_ttf1_orig
c_kssaf s_pqaf_orig s_ttf2
c_laairf_ah s_pqf1 s_ttf2_orig
c_laairf_dp s_pqf1_orig s_ttrV
c_ttth1 s_pqf2 s_ttth1
c_ttth2 s_pqf2_orig s_ttth1V
s_aaf s_pqr s_ttth2
s_ah_gef s_pqr_orig s_ttth2V
s_ah_laairf s_pqsf s_tvir
s_azi1 s_pqsf_orig s_vxg
s_azi2 s_pqw s_vxg_orig
s_dai1 s_pqw_orig s_vxi1
s_dai1c s_psf s_vxi1c
s_dai2 s_psfc s_vxi2
s_dai2c s_psw s_vxi2c
s_dp_laairf s_ptr s_vyg
s_dpaocbf s_pygd s_vyg_orig
s_dpaocf s_pygu s_vyi1
s_dpegg s_pyrdc s_vyi1c
s_dpgef s_pyrdr s_vyi2
s_dpgef_orig s_pyrdy s_vyi2c
s_fstape s_pyruc s_vzg
s_hdgi1 s_pyrur s_vzi1
s_hdgi1_orig s_pyruy s_vzi1_p3
s_hdgi2 s_rh_gef s_vzi2
s_hdgi2_orig s_rolli1 s_vzi2_p3
s_hg s_rolli2 s_wdff1
s_hi1 s_sh_gef s_wlgff1
s_hi1_p3 s_ssaf s_wltff1
s_hi2 s_tad s_wsff1
s_hi2_p3 s_tad_f1 s_wxff1
s_hpalt_psfc s_tad_f2 s_wyff1
s_hr159s s_tad_th1 s_wzff1
s_hr232 s_tad_th2 z_acnum
s_irsV s_tasdf z_class
s_jwlwc s_tashf z_fstindx
s_laairfV s_tashfc z_fstutc
s_latg s_theta z_min_size
s_latg_orig s_thetae z_offset_dpgef
s_lati1 s_thetav z_offset_hdg
s_lati1c s_timehp_run z_offset_pqf1
s_lati2 s_timehp_ymdhms z_offset_trdprt5
s_lati2c s_timetc_01 z_offset_ttf1
s_longg s_timetp z_offset_ttf2
s_longg_orig s_tl z_pqnd
s_longi1 s_tpygdc z_pqst
s_longi1c s_tpygdcV z_srate
s_longi2 s_tpygdd z_utclacal
s_longi2c s_tpygddV z_utcth1cal
s_machd s_tpyguc z_utcth2cal
s_machh s_tpygucV
(2) The following documentation files reside in subdirectory
/Documents:
0READ_ME * A general description of the UCI processed
data.
0togac_slow_var.ps * PostScript file of variables'
nomenclature used by
UCI.
0togac_slow_var.tex * ASCII Latex text file of UCI variables'
nomenclature.
GPS_corr_uci.txt * Sean Burns memo of Dec 20 1994 regarding
the UCI
* GPS correction of the INE groundspeed.
UCI_WP3D_memo.txt * A copy of a memo similar to this one.
plot1.txt * A Description of plot1_gpscomp_clr.ps and
* plot1_gpscomp_bw.ps
plot1_gpscomp_clr.ps * A color PostScript plot comparing
the GPS correction
* scheme of UCI with that of NOAA/NSSL.
plot1_gpscomp_bw.ps * A black and white PostScript plot
comparing the
* GPS correction scheme of UCI with that of NOAA/NSSL.
plot2.txt * A description of
plot2a_windcomp_clr.ps and
* plot2b_windcomp_clr.ps
plot2a_windcomp_clr.ps * Two color plots which compare the
calculated winds
plot2b_windcomp_clr.ps * by UCI, NOAA/AOC, and NOAA/NSSL
during a set of wind
* maneuvers.
plot3.txt * A Description of
plot3a_windcomp_bw.ps and
* plot3b_windcomp_bw.ps
plot3a_windcomp_bw.ps * Two black and white plots which
compare the
plot3b_windcomp_bw.ps * calculated winds by UCI, NOAA/AOC,
and NOAA/NSSL
* during a set of wind maneuvers.
(3) PostScript graphs for the following flight days reside
in subdirectory /Plots_var:
921102 921126 921215 930117 930210
921106 921128 921216 930118 930217
921113 921212 930109 930201 930219
921115 921213 930111 930206 930220
921119 921214 930116 930209 930222
For each plane, there are nine pages of graphs per flight,
consisting of a 3-D flight track and eight time series "strip-chart
" plots of important variables. A PostScript file listing
all variables with their definitions and units and using the
UCI nomenclature is available.
TOGA COARE: 921113
Aircraft 42 (H)
1. 921113H_plt1 (3-D Flight Track)
2. 921113H_plt2 (Navigation)
3. 921113H_plt3 (Aircraft)
4. 921113H_plt4 (Winds)
5. 921113H_plt5 (Temperature)
6. 921113H_plt6 (Humidity)
7. 921113H_plt7 (Radiation)
8. 921113H_plt8 (Miscellaneous)
9. 921113H_plt9 (More Aircraft)
Aircraft 43 (I)
1. 921113I_plt1 (3-D Flight Track)
2. 921113I_plt2 (Navigation)
3. 921113I_plt3 (Aircraft)
4. 921113I_plt4 (Winds)
5. 921113I_plt5 (Temperature)
6. 921113I_plt6 (Humidity)
7. 921113I_plt7 (Radiation)
8. 921113I_plt8 (Miscellaneous)
9. 921113I_plt9 (More Aircraft)
More information on format and file structure is given in
Projects/Toga_Cepex/.
Corrections 1. GPS Correction and Horizontal
Winds
Trimble 2100 GPS systems were installed on the WP3Ds for
TOGA COARE to allow for post-flight correction of the
Inertial Navigation Equipment (INE) drift and Schuler
oscillation. This was deemed necessary for the boundary-layer
turbulence and mean wind data in TOGA COARE; it may also
help the convection/radar flights. The GPS data were
recorded at 1 Hz on the slow-rate data tape. Overall, they
appeared to work well, although there are numerous spikes in
turns probably due to the antenna angle changing in roll,
periodic jumps with a 30-sec period, and a few unexplained
periods of no changes.
UCI's initial processing technique was to correct only for
the slow drift and Schuler oscillation (approximately 84-min
period) of the Delco INE's with a zero-phase-shift low-pass
filter using a cutoff frequency of 0.0005 Hz (33-min period)
applied to the differences between INE and GPS positions and
velocities. These filtered differences were then added to
the original INE data to create "corrected" INE data. This
procedure corrected a large percentage of the INE errors.
Comments from the radar community (Dave Raymond) last fall
stated that better corrections in turns were required. The
use of an increased cutoff frequency was examined, and Sean
Burns of UCI found by cross-spectral analysis that the GPS
horizontal velocity data had a phase shift corresponding to
a 1.2-sec time lag as well. (See memo from Sean Burns on 20
December 1994 about the details of the UCI correction scheme.)
There was no phase shift between the GPS and INE position
data. Accounting for the velocity time lag, which can only
be done to the nearest second for the slow-rate data, showed
increased improvement in the corrections. Additionally,
increasing the low-pass filter cutoff frequency to 0.0025 Hz
(6.7-min period) also was judged to further improve the
correction without allowing significant errors due to spikes
in the turns. In summary, the UCI GPS correction technique
was to shift the GPS velocity data by 1 sec and apply the
0.0025-Hz zero-phase-shift low-pass filter to the position
and velocity data. It is believed that this provides the
best overall correction. Some of the egregious GPS errors
which were found in a few flights were also manually
corrected. The possibility of differentiating the corrected
position INE data to obtain corrected ground speeds was
examined, but it was found that excessive noise was
introduced. The UCI GPS corrections were compared to those
of NOAA/NSSL. The NSSL correction appears to retain the 30-sec
periodic jumps and spikes from the GPS. A PostScript plot
comparing the two GPS corrections to the east component of
the groundspeed vector is available over ftp or the WWW.
The main effect of the GPS velocity correction is of course
on the horizontal winds. The AOC-processed data have no GPS
correction. NOAA/NSSL recently released a dataset which
corrects the AOC winds with a variational GPS scheme. These
data were compared to the UCI data. In many TOGA COARE
boundary-layer flights, precise upwind/downwind maneuvers to
check the winds were performed. These were used to obtain
separate values for calibrations of side-slip angle sensors
and dynamic pressure offsets for independent wind
calculation. The comparisons indicate that the original AOC
winds and those with the NSSL GPS correction do not pass the
wind checks. Part of this may be attributed to dynamic and
static pressure corrections used by AOC which is believed to
be erroneous; the static pressure corrections obtained from
the UCI-NCAR-AOC trailing cone test flights performed for
the TOGA COARE project were used by UCI. In the convection
flights, some upwind/downwind segments that were flown as a
part of the research plan and the circle "pearls" were
examined, and it was found that the UCI winds generally are
acceptable at high altitudes and in other maneuvers as well.
(There are exceptions when in heavy precipitation the radome
and/or the fuselage sensors disagree perhaps due to water
ingestion or icing.)
It should be noted that there are still unknowns in the WP3D
winds. These arise primarily from the calibration of the
side-slip angle and the heading accuracy from the INEs. The
Delco Carousel IV INEs which have been used on the WP3Ds
since they were built have a factory specification accuracy
of only 0.4 deg in true heading. At 100 m/s true airspeed,
this gives a wind error of 0.7 m/s. There is no independent
heading reference on the WP3Ds. (Recall that a single-antenna
GPS system such as the Trimble 2100 measures track angle,
not heading.) Examination of the difference in heading
between INE1 and INE2 reveals that they can drift during an
8-hour flight up to 0.35 deg apart. Also there is no record
at AOC of the accuracy of the alignment of the heading of
the INEs with respect to the aircraft axis, i.e., to the
side-slip sensors. (Initially UCI thought there were errors
in heading alignments, but chose instead to incorporate the
equivalent biases in slip angles.)
Overall, upwind/downwind checks indicate that the UCI
horizontal winds are good to about +/- 0.5 m/s in straight
and level flight. Comparison of the UCI-WP3D winds with
those from the WHOI IMET buoy, adjusted for the height
difference, is also good. In the turns, accuracy is degraded
due partly to some spikes from the GPS passing through the
filter and unresolved errors as discussed above. PostScript
plots comparing UCI, AOC, and NSSL winds for a set of wind
maneuvers are available. It appears that the accuracy limit
for the horizontal winds on a "production" basis for the 45
TOGA COARE WP3D flights has been reached. Some researchers
may want to make detailed corrections for specific portions
of certain flights on a case-by-case basis.
2. Air Temperature
The standard WP3D total air temperature sensors are the
Rosemount de-iced hermetically sealed units. These have a
slow response time, on the order of 1.6 sec. To obtain
ambient temperature, a correction has to be made for dynamic
heating which is about 6-12 K. This incorporates the dynamic
pressure from a Pitot tube. The frequency response of the
dynamic pressure transducers is 10 times greater than that
of the temperature sensor (about 1 Hz for the co-pilot's
fuselage Pitot), so that the calculated ambient temperature
has high frequency "signal " that is erroneous (i.e., above
about 0.1 Hz the total temperature signal is greatly
attenuated and the dynamic heating correction is not
applicable.) Therefore, for the purpose of the ambient
temperature calculation only, the dynamic pressure was low-pass
filtered (with zero phase shift) to match the response of
the de-iced total temperature sensors. (There are two on
each WP3D.) For the UCI-processed slow-rate 1 Hz data, these
filtered ambient temperatures have been used for the
calculations of all thermodynamic quantities.
For those wanting a faster-response ambient temperature
signal, the UCI thermistors with response to at least 1 Hz
are available in the UCI-processed data. (For a description
of the thermistor sensor, see Fuehrer et al. 1994.) These
were tailored to the boundary-layer conditions, so they
sometimes go off-scale at colder, high altitudes. Also, they
were subject to some radio interference. Please contact UCI
if you are interested in using these data.
3. Humidity
Several humidity sensors were flown on each WP3D in TOGA
COARE: UCI added a second-cooled mirror dewpoint (EG"&"G),
a Lyman-alpha hygrometer (AIR); AOC added their own modified
cooled mirror and installed the NCAR UV-hygrometer. For the
slow-rate data, UCI used the AOC General Eastern "cooled
mirror" signal in all calculations (humidity correction to
true airspeed, thermodynamic variables, calibration of the
AIR Lyman-alpha fast-response humidiometers.) The GEs
exhibit the usual characteristics: slow response,
oscillations, slow recovery from sharp transients, etc. For
those interested in faster response humidity data, the
calibrated Lyman-alpha signal (in terms of dew point and
absolute humidity) is available in the 1-Hz dataset. Some
cautions apply: at high altitudes one of them (on N42RF)
oscillates. Also, the calibrations were obtained by a least-squares
fit over a large portion of each flight where the dew point
was > 0 deg C and there were no oscillations or other
errors. Generally these are quite good, but some improvement
may be possible for individual shorter segments and
conditions where the dew point is less than 0 deg C. On some
flights, especially later in the IOP, the NCAR UV-hygrometers
appeared to work.
4. Radiation
In the UCI-processed dataset, the short and longwave
radiometer data have been added, using the calibrations
supplied by NOAA/AOC.
The short and longwave radiometer signals were not monitored
during the TOGA COARE field experiment. In preparation for
the subsequent CEPEX project in Hawaii immediately following
COARE, CEPEX radiation scientists noted errors in the
radiation signals and corrected these for N42RF, which was
used in CEPEX. It is hoped that the CEPEX radiation
scientists can provide a correction scheme for the TOGA
COARE dataset.
Also, the UK C130 participated in TOGA COARE and performed
some boundary-layer comparison flights on two days (17 and
18 January 1993). Dr. Phil Hignett of the UK Met Office has
worked on some of the radiation data and finds that the
downward longwave signal on N42RF had reverse polarity and a
large offset. The shortwave radiation data agreed, although
there is some question about the type of Epply colored
filters on N42RF. It may be possible to use the excellent UK
C130 radiometer data to obtain empirical corrections for
N42RF, and then use the many close formation flights with
N43RF to examine N43RF's radiation data. (The NCAR Electra
comparison flights are another source.)
5. Empirical adjustments
Prior to the 1994 TOGA COARE International Data Workshop
held in Toulouse, UCI made empirical adjustments to some of
the aircraft measurements. The adjustments consisted of
adding or subtracting a constant to/from the measurements.
These offsets were determined from the many aircraft-to-aircraft
intercomparisons in TOGA COARE with the goal of increasing
the consistency between the various aircraft platforms. They
are subject to further investigation and revision. The
empirical offsets that have been used in the UCI data
processing are summarized in the table below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
UCI Empirical Adjustments for TOGA COARE
May 20, 1994
Formula: X_adj= X_orig + Empirical Adjustment
Variable N42RF N43RF 308D
C-130
-------- ----- ----- ---- -----
Total ttf2 ttf1 N.A.
N.A.
Temperature (+0.35 C) (reference)
Ambient N.A. N.A. atb
None
Temperature (-0.2 C)
(~ref)
Dewpoint dpgef dpgef dptc (ge)
dp
Temperature (-0.50 C) (reference) (~ref)
(~ref)
Sea Surface prt5 prt5 rstb sst_dh
sst
Temperature (+0.80 C) (+0.70 C) (-0.70 C) (~ref)
N.A.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: If you use the UCI-processed WP3D TOGA COARE
data, please provide name, institution and email address
electronically to either D. Khelif (dkhelif@uci.edu) or S.
Burns (sean@cafws3.eng.uci.edu). Users will be kept informed
about revisions and future updates. Also, it would be
extremely helpful if users would inform UCI of any problems
encountered with these data.
For more information, please contact:
Carl Friehe
University of California at Irvine
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Irvine, CA 92717-3975
USA
email: cfriehe@uci.edu
Phone: (714) 824-6159
FAX: (714) 824-2249
or
Sean Burns
University of California at Irvine
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Irvine, CA 92717-3975
USA
email: sean@cafws2.eng.uci.edu
Phone: (714) 824-7437
FAX: (714) 824-2249
or
Djamal Khelif
University of California at Irvine
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering
Irvine, CA 92717-3975
USA
email: dkhelif@uci.edu
Phone: (714) 824-7437
FAX: (714) 824-2249
Reference Fuehrer, Friehe, and Edwards, 1994: J.
Tech. V 11, 476-488.
Return to Aircraft Data Overview
Return to TOGA COARE Data User's Guide
Table of Contents
Return to the
COARE Homepage
|