Graphic showing NOAA logo NCDC / Climate Mon. / Climate-2006 / Feb / U.S. Drought / Regional / Help

Climate of 2006 - February
U.S. Regional Drought Watch


National Climatic Data Center, 9 March 2006

Global Analysis / Global Hazards / United States / U.S. Drought / National Drought Overview / Extremes
Use these links to access detailed analyses of Global and U.S. data.

Regional Drought Overview / Additional Contacts / Questions


Top of Page Regional Overview

Dryness afflicted many of the same areas this month that have experienced dry conditions during the last several months (January, December, November). February was drier than normal in the southern Plains, from the southern Appalachians to mid-Atlantic coast, and in a broad swath from the Southwest across the central Plains to mid-Mississippi Valley. About 18 percent of the contiguous U.S. was very dry (i.e., precipitation in the bottom 10th percentile of the historical record).

Above-normal precipitation continued to bring improvement to parts of the northern Rockies and High Plains. Near the end of the month, beneficial rains brought temporary relief to the drought area in northeast Texas, but it was not enough to compensate for the significant deficits of the last 11 months.
Map showing Palmer Z Index

The February precipitation pattern at the primary stations in Alaska was mixed. Across Hawaii, the precipitation pattern was also mixed. In Puerto Rico, the month was predominantly dry, based on National Weather Service radar estimates of precipitation. February streamflow averaged near normal for Puerto Rico and the Hawaiian Islands.
Map showing 3-month Standardized Precipitation Index

The February dryness aggravated long-term drought in the Southwest and Great Plains (3 to 6 to 9 to 12 months). Long-term moisture deficits persisted across parts of the mid-Mississippi Valley (last 9 to 12 months) and West into the northern High Plains and central Plains (last 48 to 60 months).
Map showing Current Month Palmer Hydrological Drought Index

Some regional highlights:
  • Several states had the tenth driest, or drier, month in February and also for multi-month seasons (December-February, September-February, March-February and others). These states include:
  • Record dry conditions were reported at several stations in Arizona, New Mexico, Texas, and West Virginia. At the end of February, Phoenix, AZ had no precipitation for 133 consecutive days, making November 2005-February 2006 the driest November-February on record. With just 0.14 inch of precipitation since November 1, Albuquerque, NM had the driest November-February since at least 1893.
  • Numerous wildfires during the month burned across several states in the central and southern Plains, southern Appalachians, and adjoining parts of the Tennessee and Ohio valleys. The fires were especially widespread during the end of February into the beginning of March.
  • In central Texas, managers at the Edwards aquifer imposed a drought alarm, asking users who draw their water from the aquifer to lower their water consumption by 20 percent. As of February 12, drought conditions, statewide, have created an estimated $1.5 billion in losses. In Arizona, the Commission on Emergency Management declared a drought warning for the Navajo Nation. By the end of the month, in parts of Illinois farm ponds and wells had gone dry and numerous grass fires had developed. The Missouri Drought Assessment Committee declared 81 of the state's counties in some form of drought status, ranging from drought advisory to Phase 3 "conservation phase" drought.
  • More than two-thirds of the winter wheat crop in Texas and Oklahoma was rated poor to very poor by early March. The winter wheat crop was also suffering in other states in the Plains, Midwest, and East.
  • End-of-month and month-averaged soil moisture conditions, based on model computations (CPC-1, CPC-2, MRCC), were drier than normal across a broad swath from the southern Plains to the central Plains and western Great Lakes. From this core area, dry soil moisture conditions extended into the southwestern and east central U.S. The models also indicated dry soil moisture conditions in parts of Alaska and Hawaii, and near the surface and at depth from Nebraska and Kansas to the Lower Great Lakes and Ohio Valley.
These overall conditions are evident in the following indicators:

A detailed review of drought and moisture conditions is available for all contiguous U.S. states and the nine climatological regions:
REGIONS:
Northwest West North Central East North Central
Northeast Central Southeast
South Southwest West
Map showing the nine U.S. standard regions
STATES:
Alabama Arizona Arkansas
California Colorado Connecticut
Delaware Florida Georgia
Idaho Illinois Indiana
Iowa Kansas Kentucky
Louisiana Maine Maryland
Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota
Mississippi Missouri Montana
Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire
New Jersey New Mexico New York
North Carolina North Dakota Ohio
Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania
Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota
Tennessee Texas Utah
Vermont Virginia Washington
West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming
* State page has supplemental information.


Map showing February State Precipitation Ranks
Oklahoma statewide November-February Precipitation, 1895-2006


Graph showing Western U.S. Percent Area in Moderate to Extreme Drought


Top of Page Additional Contacts:

Damage due to the drought has been summarized by NOAA and the Office of Global Programs in the Climatological Impacts section of the Climate Information Project. Crop impact information can be found at the USDA NASS (National Agricultural Statistics Service) and Weekly Weather and Crop Bulletin pages. Drought statements by local National Weather Service Offices can be found at the NWS Hydrologic Information Center. Drought threat assessments and other information can be found at NOAA's Drought Information Center. Additional drought information can be found at the National Drought Mitigation Center, the USDA's National Agricultural Library, the interim National Drought Council, and the NOAA Paleoclimatology Program. The following states have set up web pages detailing current drought conditions and/or their plans to handle drought emergencies:

Arkansas - Colorado - Delaware - Delaware River Basin (DE-NJ-NY-PA) - Florida Panhandle - Georgia - Idaho - Kentucky - Maine - Maryland - Missouri - Montana - New Jersey-1 - New Jersey-2 - New Mexico - Oklahoma-1 - Oklahoma-2 - Pennsylvania-1 - Pennsylvania-2 - South Carolina - Texas - Vermont - Virginia

For additional information on current and past wildfire seasons please see the National Interagency Fire Center web site or the U.S. Forest Service Fire and Aviation web site.

NCDC's Drought Recovery Page shows the precipitation required to end or ameliorate droughts and the probability of receiving the required precipitation.
Additional climate monitoring graphics can be found at the Climate Prediction Center's monitoring pages:
Precipitation and modeled soil moisture anomaly maps for the Midwest U.S. can be found at the Midwest Regional Climate Center's monitoring page.
Drought conditions on the Canadian prairies can be found at the Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Drought Watch page.


Top of Page
  • For all climate questions other than questions concerning this report, please contact the National Climatic Data Center's Climate Services Division:

    Climate Services Division
    NOAA/National Climatic Data Center
    151 Patton Avenue
    Asheville, NC 28801-5001
    fax: 828-271-4876
    phone: 828-271-4800
    email: ncdc.info@noaa.gov

  • For further information on the historical climate perspective presented in this report, contact:

    Richard Heim
    NOAA/National Climatic Data Center
    151 Patton Avenue
    Asheville, NC 28801-5001
    fax: 828-271-4328
    email: Richard.Heim@noaa.gov

    -or-

    Jay Lawrimore
    NOAA/National Climatic Data Center
    151 Patton Avenue
    Asheville, NC 28801-5001
    fax: 828-271-4328
    email: Jay.Lawrimore@noaa.gov
Top of Page

Graphic showing NOAA logo NCDC / Climate Mon. / Climate-2006 / Feb / U.S. Drought / Regional / Help